- TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE FOR FREE
- TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE .EXE
- TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE REGISTRATION
- TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE PRO
This is because information is managed separately and information attributed activity is moved by the groups' philosophy/goals/mission/duty. The average group will always have data that are less information and more data. To be a devil's advocate, this is why tags are bad for personal use. But Rightnote still seems to be progressing while UR seems not to be. I've also been tempted back into using Ultra Recall more since trying Rightnote, and it does do a lot of things pretty well quite a number of similarities with Rightnote, all in Ultra Recall's favour with exception of the Opera clipping. I couldn't wait to get away from them (& the mainframe equivalents) - I loved the whole GUI phenomenon from the moment I saw Lisa (and stayed away from IBM & MS machines as much as I could until Win 95 appeared). I can see that you have to like hotkeys if you are used to WordStar and derivatives. And I find it much more intuitive with access to commands than the alternatives (remembering that I hate using hotkeys). I like the freedom to organise and reorganise (outlining is really good for this) and having a lot of the things I write in one easy to access place. But Rightnote still seems to be progressing while UR seems not to be.Īs I said originally, I use TreeDBNotes primarily for writing and don't clip anything into it I rarely attach files either. Just seems less good generally, and less suiting my way of working, than the other programs I have. I've used Rightnote a bit more now, and am struggling to find anything I can use it for apart from the clipping from Opera tiny spreadsheet tables seems to be the only other thing and I don't know how much I would want to use that. Web clipping is more of an archive/PIM thing - and as I said, it claims to be a PIM, but I've never seen it as one, and feel it is just a (very good) text editor. The clipping it does do, is just the usual sort of screen shots, images, text etc but it does work and is integrated in the program. Yes, I don't think it does web clipping in the way those other programs do. Depends how you do things, which is one of the reasons I think these programs are very subject to personal preference. What it does have is a lot of options on the menus (top & right click), so I have always found it very easy to explore the possibilities of the program. I don't used keyboard shortcuts, so I hadn't noticed that - I also tend not to use Help files. I couldn't see anything about Web clipping in the sense that EverNote, RightNote, UR etc.
I don't much care for the e-book Help file, either, especially as the Ctrl+G global search doesn't work, and it seems a bit thin on real information. Maybe they just forgot to change the name?
TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE .EXE
EXE being a basic Free version on its own and more advanced Standard version on being unlocked, but I don't think they should still advertise the Standard version as Free when it's payware. But if you look at their Buy Now page and scroll down to TreeDBNotes (Free), it gives different purchase prices for personal and business use.
TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE REGISTRATION
I thought, oh, they're offering a free registration to unlock extra features and get you on their mailing list, an uncommon ploy but not unknown.
TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE FOR FREE
It lists far more features for Free registered than vanilla Free. The headings are Free, Free registered, and Pro.
TREEDBNOTES VS EVERNOTE PRO
Have you checked the Free version lately? Their TreeDBNotes FREE vs PRO - Feature CompareTreeDBNotes FREE vs PRO - Feature Compare chart left me slightly puzzled.